Tuesday, 4 July 2017


Today Americans celebrate their independence day. I imagine most of the Alt Right will be joining in the celebrations. But let me suggest that they shouldn't. Why? Because the American Revolution was the start of White Genocide. It was the first formal repudiation of genetic connectedness as the basis of belonging, with peoplehood coming to be redefined as something abstract and assignable, a thing controlled by governments rather than an ancestral birthright.

[This is a modified version of an essay I posted last year (link).]

In a recent show (link), David Duke celebrated the American revolution against Britain as a tremendous triumph for humanity. As I see it, however, the American revolution was the genesis of the catastrophe now engulfing us, the minoritisation of European peoples in their own lands, the Great Replacement or the European Genocide as I prefer to call it. In other words, what Duke celebrates was the principal cause of the predicament he now bemoans.

Why do I say this? In the American revolution, what we had was a people breaking away from their ancestral homeland and kinfolk and beginning to define their peoplehood in abstract terms: based on place of birth, an administrative status called citizenship, values that supposedly embody the essence of the people, the co-existence of multiple "religions" within the same state and a formal proclamation that all people are "equal". These are the very ideas that are now destroying our civilisation. It is they that legitimate the mass migration that is turning Europeans into ethnic minorities in the lands they created.

Indeed, one of the complaints levelled against George IV in the American Declaration of Independence was precisely that he was trying to block immigration.
He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.
Even if these ideas have had catastrophic and perhaps fatal consequences for European peoplehood, you could argue that the American Revolution was hijacked by intellectuals - Thomas Jefferson in particular - and used to advance an agenda that ordinary people would not have supported had they understood it. Indeed, you could argue that the intellectuals themselves did not understand the long-run implications of the principles they were articulating. If they did not affirm the importance of Christendom or the "white race", it was because they felt no need to. It was "self-evident". But what was self-evident then is much less so to the rulers of the present day.

The American Revolution began as an affirmation of ancestral peoplehood but ended in its formal repudiation. How so? What irked the revolutionaries at the start was the denial their rights as British people. They saw themselves as Britons entitled to the customary rights of Britons, as established in law and precedent. It was because they were refused those rights, simply because of geographic separation, that the rebellion began. They were not demanding abstract "human rights" or "droits de l'homme", as the French revolutionaries did, but specific customary rights that had been acquired by British people - uniquely, not as an inheritance of all mankind - over the centuries.

But however the American rebellion began, it ended with the triumph of abstraction over reality; of values over ancestry; of imaginary idealism over shared history. The entrancing effect of these ideas on Europe's leaders over the centuries since is what has conjured into being the invasions we are now experiencing. The sex attacks in Cologne; the mass rapes in Rotherham; the jihad attacks in Paris and Brussels - all of these were already implicit in the American Revolution and the complex of ideas it gave rise to about the nature of peoplehood.

17 comments:

  1. 4 TH of Jew Lie !!! US Independence from what ??? JEW ??? USA is a barking dog for international jew !!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The 4th of July celebrates a Judeo-Masonic revolution against a British white power structure

    https://nationalsatanist.wordpress.com/2017/07/04/the-4th-of-july-celebrates-a-judeo-masonic-revolution-against-a-british-white-power-structure/

    ReplyDelete
  3. David Duke works for Jews.

    https://nationalsatanist.wordpress.com/?s=david+duke

    ReplyDelete
  4. Part I.

    The American revolution was the start of White genocide? I don't think so. White genocide began when the kings and queens of Europe took the jews into their courts and confidence, and allowed their policy to be dictated by them. White genocide began when these same kings and queens not only borrowed heavily from jewish lenders and speculators enslaving future generations of Whites to the jews, but also by allowing jews back into their countries time and time again after expelling them.

    How are British colonists declaring their independence in America and becoming a separate country any different than Whites in Germany or Norway having their own countries? At the end of the day, we all belong to the same race and yet, have existed successfully in different countries. It isn't separation that caused White genocide, it's that we never figure out that having the jew in our midst is lethal to us.

    Nowhere in the founding American documents or in the transcripts of any of the Founding Fathers' speeches is there to be found any quote that declares America should be open to the "co-existence of multiple religions." This is false and was never intended for America. As far as all men being "equal" it's made very clear in other founding documents, too many to cite here, that those who were considered "equal", especially when it came to the right to vote, were only "free White men". At the same time, the Founding Fathers knew the dangers of having the jews in our midst and proposed a Constitutional amendment that would have prohibited jews from ever immigrating to America. Sadly, that crucial amendment failed, most likely due to White ignorance and shabbos goy assets already in the colonies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Norwegians and Germans are separate peoples with distinct ancestries. That intimate bond of peoplehood, rather than the more generic bond of race, is critical in helping people mobilise their energies for defence against (((predators))). The various white tribes of America have been unable to unite effectively to defend their own interests, in part because the lingering influence of their separate ancestries has created division among them.

      Delete
    2. Regardless of the country of origin, ancestry or culture, all Whites are ultimately descended from the ancient Aryans. Yes, we've developed into various sub-races, but ultimately, we are all brothers, regardless of our differences in language, culture, country or ethnicity.

      Delete
    3. Desperate times will calp for deperate measures. The time when the European whites will have no choice but to organize on racial basis is rapidly approaching. We can already seen this in action politically: Visegrad group (Hungary, Poland, Czech-Slovakia). I could totally envision Hungarians and Croatians and Austrians and Polish and Czechs uniting together to defend their ancestral homelands, indeed lives, against the Jewish-manufactured brown invasion.

      Delete
  5. Part II.

    With regard to the immigration of foreigners, once again, it's very clear when reading supporting documents, especially by Thomas Jefferson, that the ONLY immigration the colonists where willing to accept was that from western Europe. In fact, although Thomas Jefferson was against slavery, his intention was to free the slaves and repatriate them all back to Africa. In speaking of the slaves, he states this many times in his correspondence including:

    "Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free, nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government."

    Not surprisingly, only the first half of this statement is engraved on Jefferson's memorial in Washington D.C. to give the false impression that he was for a multi-cultural society with blacks and Whites living freely and equally among each other. Nothing is further from the truth.

    To lay White genocide at the feet of America is entirely absurd and to be largely uninformed with regard to history. The author does not mention how, if America separating from Britain contributed to White genocide, then how did Rhodesia, South Africa, Canada and Australia separating from Britain do the same? How did Europe, abandoning all connection to faith in preference of atheism, especially in Scandinavia, contribute to the erosion of bonding forces between Whites? It can be argued that Christianity certainly has its downside. Even so, to discard a prevalent uniting philosophy among Whites and replace it with nothing to equally secure those common bonds is to contribute far more to the dissolution of the White race than colonists going their own way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The separation of the United States served as a the prototype for the idea of a country founded on values, "citizenship", rather than ancestral belonging. Its example helped promote the prevalence of those ideas within our civilisation. The separation of those other countries was not as historically significant because the template then had already been established.

      Delete
    2. With respect, you can't be American because you don't understand American history. I can tell you're not American because of the British spelling of "civilization" in your reply. Please don't assume you know more about American history than an American, as I would never assume to know more about British history than a Brit. It wasn't until the 20th century that the jews tried to sell America as a "melting pot" to the rest of the world to ramp up immigration, a place where racial identity could be replaced by civic identity--anyone could come, pursue their dream and become an "American" on paper. I assure you, this was never the intention of our founders, as America remained 98% White (even with the slaves) up to the mid 20th century. In fact, the colonists first came to North
      America in 1550 in three separate settlements. My ancestors arrived in 1620 (mother's side) and 1635 (father's side), and for nearly the first 100 years of colonization since the first settlement at Roanoke, there were NO non-Whites, except the Indians (Asiatics), who are NOT indigenous to this land, although that story is too long to tell here. It wasn't until slaves were brought here by jews who ran the entire transatlantic slave trade that non-Whites came into our new nation...not by legislation, not by our Constitution or founding fathers edict, but by jewish commerce. Big surprise. If you'd like me to send you all the proper quotes with citations from our founding fathers stating that the slaves needed to be repatriated elsewhere and that this land was for free White men only, I can share them. You should also know that the famous phrase "Give me your tired, your poor..." that people equate with immigration on the Statue of Liberty is NOT original, but was added on a plaque to the statue 8 years after it was gifted to us by France, by you guessed it, Emma Lazarus, a jew.

      Delete
    3. I've seen the quotes already. I can assure you I know more about American history than 99+% of Americans just as I know more about Jewish history than 99+% of Jews.

      In any case, it is not primarily about American history. It is about the history of ideas. And the idea of a "nation of immigrants" where the status of belonging was artificial and assignable, based on "values" not ancestry, comes largely from the founding of the USA.

      No doubt the founders of the country would have been horrified by the non-European demographic takeover. But that's just the point. The institutions they established, the principles they articulated, were not able to withstand the threats that were to come.

      Delete
    4. You are incorrect, and I can guarantee you that you don't have the depth of knowledge of American history that I've spent a lifetime accruing from original sources, not public school "government approved" textbooks. America was absolutely not founded on the idea of being a "nation of immigrants". Nowhere in history has there ever been a successful heterogeneous nation. America's success came directly from its White European homogeneity until our immigration laws were changed by the jewish lobby in the 1960's. Coincidentally, so were Canada's immigration laws changed just a few short years after ours. When the Refugee Act of 1980 came into play, Canada got a Refugee Act of their own in less than five years. The way both the U.S. and Canada's immigration philosophy and legislation changed virtually in tandem at practically the same time in history is more than just coincidence. The fix was in to destroy our nations internally via multiculturalism by the same jewish powers. As you're well aware, they've also been doing this in all western nations for the last 40 years or so, longer in the case of America. Today, the jewish media calls Britain, France, Sweden, Germany and all European nations a “nation of immigrants”, not just the U.S. That doesn’t make it true for them or America. Now, once the founding race is sufficiently diluted or nearly outnumbered, they use their media to try to convince the public (that's largely ignorant of its own history) that they've "always been a nation of immigrants" when that is a complete lie. The idea is to convince the gullible people that blacks and browns have always been in your/my country and therefore that Whites have no real claim on the land, which is no more true for Europe than it is for America. This is why they use multi-racial casting in programs based on White history and mythology, to give the false impression that brown people have"always been here" and we have no history apart from them. If that were true, the jews wouldn't have to try to hard to convince us of its so-called reality.

      Delete
    5. No, you can't guarantee that. You can't possibly know one way or the other. And the fact that you feel such certainty about something you cannot possibly be certain about inclines me to regard all of your other statements with an unusually strong degree of scepticism.

      America quite obviously was a nation of immigrants at the time of its founding and virtually all of its leading politicians agreed that it should continue to receive large immigration flows. So you are incorrect. It was founded, conceptually, as a "nation of immigrants" even though, in reality, there is no such thing. Once you've accepted the premise that vast numbers of foreigners will come to your country on an ongoing basis, it becomes difficult to discriminate between them.

      The American example of being successfully economically and militarily, having managed to integrate vast numbers of immigrants from diverse countries, was the primary influence in establishing immigrationist ideology within the ruling classes of our civilisation.

      Absent the American example, Jewish sophistries would have fallen on deaf ears.

      The proof is in the result. It's like arguing that a castle was well-designed even after it has been breached and conquered.

      Delete
  6. Part III.

    Those who don't live in America and especially those who are not White don't understand that it's precisely because of how America was born, through revolution, that Americans STILL have a very strong sense of revolution, freedom and independence in their blood today. The American ideal was and has always been about self-reliance--hands off and let me do it my own way. True self-reliance is completely lost on brown people, and even many from the social welfare states of Europe. Most Americans who are White still ascribe very strongly to this ethic, and it's this very mindset, the spirit of revolution and independence that will see America react VERY differently than Europe when the sh*t hits the fan. The powers that be understand the American spirit, know it's alive and well, and it terrifies them...as it should, which is why they've been trying to confiscate our guns for decades. Although the colonists came here in 1550, it's only been 241 years since the American revolution, not thousands of years as in Europe, therefore, the spirit of revolution is still very young in our veins, and I believe that is what will save us in the end.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well a majority of births in the US are now to non-whites. You've let Jews take over your society, dominate your politics and shape your foreign policy with barely any discernible resistance.

      Delete
    2. jews are in control and shaping the foreign and financial policy of all western nations and have been doing so for a very long time, just over 100 years for the U.S. and several hundred years for places like Britain and France. You're right in that our collective resistance has not reared its head, yet. Like Whites elsewhere, we've become too comfortable, too complacent. Unfortunately for most people, disaster has to come upon them personally before they wake up. It has to impact their personal paycheck, the food they can no longer feed their family and so on for them to take personal action. I don't know when that will be or how it will look when it happens. Will it be a race war with Muslims, Mexicans and blacks, all instigated by the jews? Will it be martial law? I don't know. What I do know is that whenever Americans reach their rock bottom, they will not take it lying down, especially in the Southern United States where Confederate pride still runs high, where many of the ancestors of those who already tried once to separate from a tyrannical government still live today. As I said, when it's Game On, Americans will fight to win or die. People around the world refer to this as the cowboy spirit sometimes, but it's what makes me most proud to be an American.

      Delete
  7. I agree with CZ's point that a nation based on 'ideas' will eventually founder because those ideas can be replaced by others which may be entirely antithetical, as now appears the case. However, for almost two full centuries, American Federal Law recognised that America was founded by Caucasians (and by extension, Christians, certainly not Moslems, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, atheists or deists) because, from 1790 when the first 'immigration law' was put on the statute books, until 1965 when the Jews staged their biggest coup d'etat against the USA and its citizens with their Jewish-initiated and Jewish-backed Immigration Act 1965 (in which they used their catspaw, Teddy Kennedy, as their spokesman to assert that this law would not change the racial makeup of the country, when that was clearly its intention and goal), US immigration laws stated that emigration to the US was to be from 'white' Anglo-Saxon countries (thus reflecting the historical demographic foundations of the original 13 colonies). The famines and social revolutions in Europe in 1848, the discovery of gold at Sutter's Mill in California (the Gold Rush of 1849),the great loss of life amongst Northern and Southern American men in the Civil War (1861-65), the push after the Civil War to open the West via a coast to coast railway system, AND the deliberate, lying propaganda of the Jewish press in the US and especially in Britain (the Daily Telegraph was foremost along with the Jewish Chronicle) over the supposed 'pogroms' of Jews in Tsarist Russia (almost entirely without any factual basis as the British Government discovered when it issued its own unbiased report) --- all this contributed to a weakening of immigration rules to allow into the US Southern Europeans and Jews.

    ReplyDelete